My Response Concerning Origins and Reality.

Anonymous: "There has to be a cause, even if that cause is the equivalent of someone throwing a rock in a pond, causing waves to ripple."

Your entire argument is an "argument from ignorance fallacy". I think the problem is differentiating between "cause" and reality. The reality is that for either scenario to exist there had to be some essential component, that being a God or the "necessary and sufficient conditions" to bring about the reality we try to understand. Either way, by mere simplicity it seems like a leap of faith that a "supreme being" existed as compared to the mere necessary components having existed, always. It is either a superior being or the "necessary and sufficient" components that have ALWAYS existed.

Concerning quantum mechanics: scientists do not sufficiently understand quantum mechanics in order to conclude any theory as being law in quantum mechanics (as far as I know, they are all principles, if not mere speculations and unrestrained theories). It, therefore, seems likely to me that we do not fully understand quantum mechanics in order to derive some reasonably realistic conclusion concerning the subject.